Grrl Power #1144 – Just shoot me, me
The “clothing pressure lines” (I don’t know if there’s a more succinct term for that) can actually be part of the fun because they make the pictures look a lot more spontaneous, and a lot less like you were hanging out in a terry cloth robe while some lady touches up your makeup and the lighting guy tweaks the position of a few lamps.
Of course, Sydney’s not exactly an expert at nude selfies. She only sent Frix some because he assured her that “all the computers on Earth couldn’t hack his phone.”
I had to look up “Occupied” in French, but there’s a masculine and feminine form. I’m not sure how someone occupies a thing in a masculine way, probably it involves a lot of splaying, but for a unisex airplane bathroom, I guessed they probably use the masculine form, because of, you know, the history of the entire human race. But I asked on Twitter, and someone in the know said it’s not about the occupier, it’s about the gender of the bathroom. Not the intended gender of the people using the bathroom, the gender of the word “bathroom.” The gendered aspect of romance languages always seemed silly to me, like, learning languages is already tough, (especially when you do it later in life with no real chance for immersion.) So why tack on this addition, which in a lot of cases is utterly arbitrary, that makes learning that much more difficult? Whoever invented Esperanto and thought it would be a good universal language, but then also made it a romance language was simply not approaching the problem from a practical standpoint IMO.
When the world consisted mostly of spears and swords and bassinets and castles and fresh baked bread and hats, the gendered thing maybe made more sense, but in the age of wi-fi and video game texture tessellation, assigning gender involves flipping a lot of coins. What gender is wi-fi? What gender is the stratosphere, or the ozone layer? Is all air the same gender? I know there are answers to these questions, my point is, as the world becomes increasingly complex and our scientific understanding grows, the question of gendered nouns feels real arbitrary in a lot of cases.
Of course, complaining that something in a language doesn’t make sense is silly, because nearly all languages are a mess, as they evolved naturally over 5,000 years, and that’s before there was a new meme or fleek yeeting every week. Generally, the people inventing new words aren’t structure obsessed linguists. The guy who invented the term “Donkey Show?” Probably not a scholar.
Of course, after all that, someone then told me that airlines pretty much use English for everything because that’s just the standard and there are certain industries where you don’t want someone fucking up because of confusing labeling, even though I’m hopeful that someone giving a locked airplane bathroom door a jiggle isn’t going to knock it from the sky.
The March Vote Incentive is up! The thumbnail is weird because the picture doesn’t have anyone’s face in it. It’s an odd incentive, admittedly. Trying something new. But hopefully you all still enjoy it.
Variant outfits and lack thereof over at Patreon, as well as the semi-usual bonus incentive related comic.
.
Double res version will be posted over at Patreon. Feel free to contribute as much as you like.
there also seems to be an abundance of room in that stall for an airplane lavatory. but Sydney is small so maybe it just looks bigger then the ones i have been in where you can barely turn around.
I’m totally making Anvil’s shirt, Dave. I feel like you need a shop, cause I’m sure this shirt would sell.
Anvil’s shirt is clever, but the market won’t be that expansive. I’m certain it would sell, but I have doubts as to the numbers. Could be wrong.
HOWEVER ….
I would like to note that Sydney in panel #8 (2nd to last) where she has her shirt gathered in front … Sydney could absolutely rock a shirt (or even fancier fashion) with a boob window in it with a similar effect that the neck/head hole gives her here. She should consult Dabbler on how to design a few options that work that theme.
Also reminds me: Dabbler & Cora certainly have access to space & demon tech that could bump Sydney up a cup size or three … IF sydney wanted to do so. Probably even choose between a temporary or a permanent body mod. In any case, making boob-window shirts for Sydney a Thing that could Happen around these parts regularly & in different configurations. Even some awkward comedy potential if Sydney did experiment with such a thing and what Frix’s reaction might be. Or, anyones reaction, really. Especially Sydney having an ADHD freakout over losing her balance with a new top-heavy look.
I’d argue the taregt market for that shirt is quite expansive.
probably easier to sell the graphic so people can take it to a shop that does logo prints.
something a guy called nabeziel did with a few of his things iirc.
When you say Nabezial, you mean Stjepan Sejic right? The guy who wrote and drew Twitch?
… and other NSFW things (Sunstone for one)
that’s a comic one can really get tied up in.
I suspect that’s a pun, and probably a really bad one, but I won’t send ninja because I can’t be sure, since I haven’t read Sunstone.
This reminds me of when I was a nude model and I would have to come in baggy clothes and no underwear for just thid reason.
I would think that Sydney’s deep knowledge of comic book tropes would cause her to share my suspicion that this is not going to go as she plans. This seems like a pretty contrived situation, which would seem to suggest that some sort of sudden and dramatic plot-twist is about to occur. Hmm. Have we ever established whether or not things like her passive feather-fall will work properly if the orbs are not actually spinning around her head?
Syndey’s shirt, when worn like that, actually looks like a different shirt, with that long band around the shoulders. I legitimately thought that I hadn’t been paying attention to her outfit because now it looks like she’s wearing a shirt with a boob window and rocking it.
That’s the look she’s going for
“-even though I’m hopeful that someone giving a locked airplane bathroom door a jiggle isn’t going to knock it from the sky.”
Kenya/Anvil could do it. Hopefully if she did absorb the kinetic energy of the bathroom door lock it would spread to the whole plane. Otherwise I imagine either the lock is going to have 0 momentum while the aircraft continues at 900km/h and shoot right through the tail destroying who knows what kind of important wires and electronics, the door shoots through the plane tail destroying much more, the entire plane stops but passengers continue and 900km/h to repaint the interior of the aircraft. Hopefully, though the entire aircraft, including passenters would simply stop… and plumet… Ok, HOPEFULLY Kenya simply wouldn’t do it at all.
I’m pretty sure Anvil can only capture kinetic energy that would be otherwise released in a collision, i.e. when touching something that’s moving relative to her, probably also on an impact course.
She can absorb a punch, but not when someone drags her around in a grappling move (for example Vehemence).
I think there actually is a ‘boob enlarger’ (enbooben) photo app.
Yep. There are several actually.
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/body-shape-resizer-editor/id1343732984?irgwc=1&clickid=TSFwp6VLUxyLUyUVvOxg825cUkAT6NTlwUkE140
I’ve never had the nerve to send anything but a cleavage shot to my internet hunny. ^_^’
I don’t trust phone security enough. :)
I like to think that if I had a body I could feel good about, I wouldn’t care if some naughty pics got loose in the wild.
I mean, look…I hate body-shaming, and also this idea that bodies are somehow immoral. The only immoral act taking place, is the asshole using/distributing them w/o permission.
…
But what do I know? I’m just a .
O neat, my comment got partially eaten.
*sigh*
That should read, “I’m just a *INSERT NEGATIVE SELF-TALK HERE*.
You could wear a Domino Mask. At least them if it leaked you’d have plausible deniability.
There is another immoral act you’re forgetting about; the bullying, ridicule and shaming of your future child(ren) and spouse at school and at work.
I wouldn’t wish that on anybody.
My (prospective) spouse isn’t someone who could be bullied in that way. ^_^
And any children we had would be raised by… us! Two people who don’t think that bodies per se are anything shameful, so…
I’m minded of an incident from my childhood in the 80’s.
Ya’ll remember Short Circuit? There was a line where Johnny is tossing off insults and says, “You’re Momma wears combat boots!” That actually became a pretty common dis among kids my age, and at one point, some little turd at school tried tossing that one my way.
I just kinda blinked and said, “Yeah? We’re a military family.”
The frame of reference just wasn’t there for me, and the bit had no bite. I would raise my kids like that. To be completely intangible to that sort of bullying.
my perspective is slewed. Bullying is something that occurs in a spectrum. believe me that kids can find themselves in a situation with bulling beyond any parents control. rumors have reached me that things have changed (I am more than 3 decades old!) but I do not really believe it. especially after a teacher tried to force us to diagnose our neurodivergent child with ADHD in the hopes of medicating the little ‘angel’ into submission (I am the child’s father…..)
on the other hand bulling can have positive influences… same child decided that diapers were more comfortable than toilets. until the kids on the bus found out. at age 7. (did you know the hospital sells diapers? I do now) potty training was done in two weeks.
parental justice is pending. (May you have a child just.like.you) also, this is a story we will hopefully be able to tell the SO before the child marries the poor fool. we stupidly told said child this so that could be why we haven’t heard of an SO yet.
The only thing I remember about Short Circuit other than the non-Indian guy who played the Indian was the rap ‘announcement’ that the Los Locos gang was yelling to nobody. Although now that I think of it, that might have been the second Short Circuit movie.
Los Locos kick your ass
Los Locos kick your face
Los Locos kick your balls into outer space.
They were a very 80s gang. Complete with over-age guys with long hair and denim and multiculturalism and one of them had a set of nunchucks for some reason. :)
Yeah actually it was definitely Short Circuit 2 now that I think of it.
I am, in general, very particular about my privacy and security of my data, given that I know that what we usually assume is very securely held/protected data isnt nearly as secure as the masses think it is. I’ve done too much work involving reviewing encryption for cases to feel safe and assured about it. :) And pretty sure I’d consider my being naked in a picture to be data that I want to keep -extreeeeeeemely- secure. :)
My understanding on the whole gendering thing is that it is very useful for clarity. Language generally isn’t formed with the goal of being easy to learn, it’s formed with the goal of conveying information. Gendering makes that conveyance easier, because if you have two words that sound similar, but one is masculine and one is feminine, then it’s pretty easy to tell the two apart if the words around it tell you if it is masculine of feminine.
Also, I don’t know if this is actually the case or not, but I feel like the whole ‘masculine’ ‘feminine’ thing is something that got added later as far as naming goes. It isn’t that people were deciding if things were manly or womanly, they just picked one of the two ways and went with it. Later on people started calling that division ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’. That’s my guess on that part anyway.
Gendering in languages is a great tool for clarity in a conversation when you start using pronouns rather than the full name for something you’re talking about. It just has absolutely nothing to do with sexual gender.
And English is the odd one out here BTW. This isn’t some weird quirk of French. It’s kinda baffling that English doesn’t have gendered language.
As a Finn, I find gendered languages baffling, at least as far as inanimate objects go, and that’s not even mentioning abstract concepts (I’m looking at you, German).
I swear to gawt, I will never understand how an inanimate object can be considered masculine or feminine.
More than anything else, this concept is what threw me when I started Spanish, back in the day. Honestly, Japanese makes so much more sense to me. -_-
there are these things one can buy in special shops in the US. including Walmart?!?!?! can you understand them having a gender?
Gender in languages for inanimate objects was just a way to break up nouns into classes because of how the Proto-Indo-European proto-language was set up. It made it easier to use pronouns clearly in that language when you were talking about multiple inanimate objects. In modern language that use gendered terms for inanimate objects it’s usually a confusing holdover from that (and sometimes has really weird results, like how in Spanish and a few other languages, the word for manliness is feminine), but it’s so ingrained in the language that it would be really difficult to remove without changing the entire language structure. The gender of the word can also change what the word means. For example, in Spanish: El Papa means ‘The Pope’ while la papa means ‘potato.’
Fun fact btw – Klingon, which was made in the 20th century by linguists for Star Trek, has three genders in language but has nothing to do with animacy. It separates genders for nouns into: 1) beings capable of language use, 2) body parts, and 3) everything else. Completely weird and randomly assigned grouping. :)
The arbitrariness is what gets me, especially when you look at differences across languages. Why is a French fork female while a Spanish fork is male? For that matter, what Spanish person decided that a cat is a boy and a rat is a girl? Insanity, I tell you!
English used to have gender! But invaders with conflicting genders for the same things wiped it out.
I can’t talk much about languages, but I have watched enough Air Crash Investigations (or Mayday) to confirm that confusing labelling and other lacks of clarity can be positively catastrophic.
Like one crash happened because the wrong fuel indicator was installed in the console. I think the one used was for the smaller model of that plane, but the components looked close enough to be mistaken if you just eyeballed them, and they fit the same slot in the console. However, it’s calibrated to read a certain amount of fuel as ‘full’, but that amount was nowhere enough for thebl bigger plane… or the distance they were flying.
And I think another one had a console component installed upside down, so when the plane tried using the readings from that component to go up, it went down instead…
But at least the airlines and manufacturers tend to learn from their mistakes.
There have been a distressing number of aircraft catastrophes and near catastrophes caused by control cables built in a way that can be reconnected the wrong way around after maintenance. You’d think it would be a no-brainer to engineer them so that the “up” cable can’t be physically connected to the “down” actuator, and so on.
Similarly, on the old Apple II computer, the data/power connector to the floppy drive could easily be connected upside down if you weren’t careful, and when it was, there would be a loud “pop” and smoke and a fried floppy drive that you’d have to replace. Ask me how I know.
That’s why the crew chief/mechanic should always go up on the check flight. Most of the time a reversal of the primary flight controls wont even let you get off the ground. It’s the less obvious stuff that lets you get up to altitude that will get you. A proper pre-flight inspection will catch control cable reversal but a problem with a fuel tank selector can catch you out over the ocean.
as someone who designs mechanical parts there are, shall we say, strong opinions on this. many many times especially when cost is an issue the PM and other accountant related groups will fall back on RTFM (Read The ‘Fine’ Manual). I consider it a best practice to try and minimize doubt as to how to assemble things. also, it seems like we never have enough time for design reviews anymore and that is often how that gets caught.
why are we always out of time? I blame golf.
not sure why sydney is reaching up to her face?. she is tiny.
its the other way around right?
Panel five? She is bonking her head in “D’oh” manner
It looks to me more like she’s knocking her fist against the overhead locker in which her orbs are stored.
Last we saw them, they were stored under her feet, or was that just the first plane?
Looks like that is the storage lockers for the other side of the plane
That is not the ass Anvil wants in her face…
Specially when she knows what Sydney eats…
are you saying there might be…emissions? blowback? revenge of the mushroom? unused Scoville points? memorable scents? eye damage?
Albeit, if you think romanced languages are hard due whole sentence following in suit of gendered starting parts, give a shot on uralic/ finno-ugric languages where base word can example be stacked to become whole sentence on itself :)
or do famous two letter talk …with just ‘o’ and ‘k’ (and no, its not ok ok ok, but koko kokko…)
or ‘kuusi palaa’ which can mean 9 different things for english speaker
It’s “Occupé” in French, the default gender being masculine. You can also justify it by explaining it is “It’s occupied”, and the gender of “it” is masculine (the person inside the toilet is not occupied, so their sex is not relevant). I could give you all the genders for “wi-fi” and “ozone layer”, but I think your point is that gendering nouns is an unnecessary complexification that should be abandoned at some point. That’s not possible, because the point of gender is not sexualising inanimate objects, the point of gender is grammar. You just can’t finish a sentence in romance languages if you have a non-gendered noun: you can’t know which article to use, you can’t decide which form of the adjective to use. That makes the simplest sentence impossible, like making a sentence without a verb in English. Gender is grammar, not sex.
It absolutely would be possible to strip the gender out of gendered languages. Either pick one of the existing articles or conjugations, or introduce a new one. It would sound weird to current speakers, but perfectly normal and reasonable to new ones.
OK, yes, you’re right, it would be possible to strip the gender of a gendered language if all speakers decide it’s OK, and you just take one gendered form of all articles and adjectives, make that the default, and ban the rest. I am sorry if I didn’t make myself clear. What I meant is, when a language is gendered, you can’t just decide “I will say the next sentence not using gender at all”. That next sentence is impossible. (I see where you are going, so yes, super short sentences like “Sit!” would be non-gendered. Not my point. I mean a sentence involving a gendered noun or article that you suddenly decide to non-gender: not possible)
tbh, I wouldn’t mind a crash course in “how to take a dick pic that doesn’t suck” lol